Best Tom Ford Perfume Dupes & Alternatives in 2026

Fragrance World's version simplifies the middle notes and lacks the sophisticated spice-floral interplay of the original; the base is warmer but less layered. The designer's Peru balsam and griotte liqueur create a more refined sweetness, while the clone reads as a more straightforward cherry-tonka composition with reduced projection.

The clone delivers adequate cherry-almond opening and base sweetness but with less refinement in mid-development and reduced depth in the balsamic-woody undertones. Longevity and sillage are typically 20-30% lighter than the original Tom Ford.

The clone performs with slightly shorter longevity (5-6 hours vs. 8+ hours) and presents a more linear progression, missing some of the original's deeper spice and balsamic undertones that add depth to the base.

Turathi Red is sweeter and more vanilla-centric in the base, while Lost Cherry maintains a more balanced amber-wood profile with darker spice undertones. The original has superior longevity and sillage, with better structural coherence across all pyramid stages.

Ambery Cherry simplifies the fragrance structure, sacrificing Lost Cherry's nuanced base notes (Peru Balsam, Vetiver, Cedar) for a more generic amber-tonka finish. The clone also lacks the liqueur and syrup richness that gives the original its signature depth and complexity.

Popped Cherry delivers a brighter, more straightforward cherry-almond profile but falls short on longevity and base complexity compared to Lost Cherry's rich, balsamic finish. The clone reads as sweeter and more one-dimensional, lacking the original's creamy sandalwood and balanced woody-floral progression.

The clone delivers a slightly sweeter, less nuanced interpretation with reduced aromatic depth in the heart notes and diminished longevity compared to the original. Dua's version skews more linear and straightforward, missing some of Lost Cherry's multi-layered depth and premium balsamic undertones.

Armaf's version is sweeter and more linear, with reduced longevity and sillage compared to the original's 8+ hour wear time. The clone loses the nuanced herbal and woody undertones that make Lost Cherry feel luxurious rather than purely candy-like.

The clone performs adequately in the opening but shows noticeable thinning in the middle and base phases, with less longevity and sillage compared to the original. The overall composition feels more linear and straightforward, missing Lost Cherry's sophisticated interplay between the gourmand and floral elements.

The clone skews slightly sweeter with less nuanced florals and a simplified base structure. Longevity and sillage are marginally weaker, with the fragrance feeling more linear and less layered compared to the original's complexity.

The clone omits cedar entirely and uses a simpler rose note, resulting in a sweeter, less dimensional fragrance with moderate longevity compared to Tom Ford's more balanced composition. Sillage is also noticeably softer, making Boozy Cherry feel less impactful after the first few hours.

More of a natural tart cherry vs Lost Cherry's candied sweetness. Less almond, more woody base. Feels more artistic and less mainstream.

The clone delivers comparable longevity and sillage but lacks the subtle bitter almond nuance and Griotte syrup complexity that define Lost Cherry's signature profile. The rose and jasmine blend in Khaltat Night reads as more generic, missing the Turkish Rose's specific spice and depth.

The clone delivers the cherry and almond top notes accurately but softens the woody undertones and misses some of the balsamic sophistication in the dry-down. Longevity and sillage are also noticeably lighter than the original Tom Ford formulation.

The clone simplifies Lost Cherry's intricate floral and balsamic mid-layers, resulting in a less complex dry-down that skews sweeter and less nuanced. Longevity and sillage are noticeably weaker, with the scent fading considerably faster than the designer original.

The clone lacks the depth and richness of Peru Balsam that gives the original its distinctive character; longevity and sillage are typically lighter on Zimaya's version. The floral notes (rose and jasmine) are less prominent, resulting in a more straightforward cherry-tonka composition rather than the original's balanced gourmand-floral profile.

The clone's heart notes appear simplified and less nuanced, potentially lacking the original's floral sophistication and griotte liqueur character. Longevity and sillage are typically lighter in clone versions, and the overall composition may feel more linear and less evolving than the designer fragrance.

The clone simplifies Lost Cherry's nuanced middle notes and lacks the bitter almond character that gives the original its distinctive balance. Dossier's version is sweeter and less complex, with noticeably shorter longevity and reduced sillage compared to the Tom Ford.

Forbidden Love emphasizes candy-like sweetness and lacks the subtle leather, spice, and creamy almond notes that give Lost Cherry its signature elegance and longevity.

The clone delivers a softer, more vanilla-forward interpretation that lacks the depth and woody complexity of the original. Longevity is reduced by 2-3 hours, and the signature tobacco blossom character feels less pronounced and refined.

The clone delivers similar opening and closing notes but lacks the smooth, buttery cacao richness of the original's heart. Longevity favors Tom Ford's version by approximately 2-3 hours, and the original has a more polished, creamy texture throughout the wear.

Pendora's version typically has slightly less longevity (5-7 hours vs 8+ hours) and may project the tobacco note more prominently, making it feel less balanced than the original. The woody undertones in the clone are often less nuanced, resulting in a slightly more linear and less evolving scent experience.

Warm Black is noticeably lighter in longevity and projection compared to Tom Ford's original, and misses some of the subtle spice and dried fruit complexity that gives Tobacco Vanille its distinctive character. The overall scent profile is more linear and less sophisticated, though it successfully mimics the core warm tobacco-vanilla aesthetic.

The clone lacks some of the original's dried fruit complexity and tends toward a more linear tobacco-forward projection with slightly less longevity. Sillage is also marginally softer compared to Tom Ford's more assertive formulation.

Dua's version emphasizes vanilla-tonka sweetness over tobacco sophistication, resulting in a lighter, more dessert-like interpretation. Longevity and sillage are typically slightly reduced compared to the Tom Ford original.

The clone's tobacco note reads slightly more linear and less nuanced than the original's sophisticated tobacco leaf character, while the vanilla tends toward a creamier, more prominent profile rather than the original's balanced integration. Longevity and sillage are also moderately reduced compared to Tom Ford's superior projection and lasting power.

This version emphasizes oud and amber more prominently than the original, creating a slightly darker and more resinous profile, whereas Tom Ford Tobacco Vanille leans into a creamier, more balanced vanilla-tobacco sweetness. The dupe also tends to have a more pronounced spice accord, particularly cinnamon and clove, which shifts the composition toward a more Middle Eastern aesthetic.

The clone leans sweeter and more vanilla-forward compared to the original's balanced tobacco-tonka complexity. Longevity and sillage are typically less impressive than Tom Ford's formulation, with a shorter projection window.

The clone slightly overemphasizes vanilla and tonka sweetness at the expense of tobacco nuance, and offers noticeably shorter longevity (4-5 hours vs. 6-8 hours for the original). Sillage is also moderately weaker, projecting closer to the skin.

The clone adds prominent oud which the original lacks, creating a different overall character despite sharing the tobacco and vanilla core. Tobacco Vanille emphasizes cacao and dried fruit complexity, while Amber Oud Tobacco prioritizes amber warmth and oud depth, resulting in a noticeably different dry-down experience.

The clone lacks the refined blending and lasting power of the original, with inferior sillage and a more linear progression that doesn't develop as gracefully. The tobacco notes tend to fade faster, leaving a more generic vanilla-tonka sweetness.

The most significant deviation is the introduction of oud as a dominant base note, which isn't present in the original and creates a more oriental-woody profile rather than a warm vanilla-tobacco experience. Longevity and projection are likely comparable, but the overall olfactive character differs substantially in the dry-down phase.

Amber Oud emphasizes oud and amber accords whereas Tobacco Vanille centers on tobacco leaf and tonka bean sweetness. The clone lacks the distinctive tobacco-spice-vanilla trinity that defines the original fragrance.

The clone matches the composition closely but falls slightly short on projection and longevity, with the leather and amber notes feeling marginally softer in the dry-down compared to the original's bold leather-amber interplay.

Craze delivers good longevity and sillage but has a more straightforward fragrance arc compared to Tuscan Leather's layered complexity. The clone's aromatic profile is slightly more mass-appealing and less refined in the heart, with less emphasis on the original's distinctive olibanum and suede interplay.

The clone offers shorter longevity (4-5 hours vs 8+ hours) and slightly reduced sillage, with a more muted leather character and less prominent woody depth in the drydown. The overall structure mirrors the original, but lacks the sophisticated interplay between the spicy and animalic elements.

Rasasi's version emphasizes the spiced and woody elements more heavily while the delicate suede and jasmine nuance of Tom Ford's leather masterpiece is somewhat flattened. Longevity and sillage are generally adequate but lack the projection refinement of the original.

Leather Oud emphasizes oud in both heart and base, creating a more boozy, animalic leather experience versus Tuscan Leather's sophisticated leather-florals blend. Longevity and sillage may differ, with the clone potentially performing stronger but less refined on skin.

The clone emphasizes oud and spice in ways the original doesn't, creating a darker and more animalic scent, while losing the raspberry and thyme brightness that makes Tuscan Leather distinctive. Longevity and sillage are likely comparable, but the overall character skews more niche and less accessible.

The clone exhibits shorter longevity and slightly softer projection compared to Tom Ford's powerhouse performance. Rasasi's interpretation emphasizes the spiced leather aspect but sacrifices some of the original's floral elegance and nuanced suede character.

The clone delivers 80-85% of the scent profile but falls short in base longevity and overall richness, lasting approximately 4-5 hours versus the original's 6-7+ hour performance. The middle leather accord feels slightly more synthetic and less nuanced compared to Tom Ford's buttery, complex leather development.

The clone generally shows weaker longevity and sillage compared to Tom Ford's original, with a less sophisticated balance between the leather and woody notes. The overall scent profile feels flatter and more linear, lacking some of the original's complex evolution.

The clone emphasizes oud prominence over jasmine, resulting in a darker, less refined fragrance with stronger sillage but reduced elegance. Longevity appears comparable, but the overall character skews more niche-oriented and less wearable for varied occasions.

The clone emphasizes oud heavily, which is absent in the original, creating a significantly different olfactory profile. Tuscan Leather's bright spice notes and delicate herbal nuances are overshadowed by Ard Al Zaafaran's heavier, more traditional Middle Eastern composition.

Leather Oudh substitutes the original's delicate fruity-herbaceous opening with heavier oud and spice, and removes the jasmine heart that provides Tuscan Leather's creamy elegance. The clone also tends to have shorter longevity and less refined sillage compared to the designer version.

The clone has a stronger oud focus and slightly less vanilla/tonka sweetness compared to the original's more balanced creamy base. Longevity is comparable, but Dua's version may project slightly less refined sillage.

Lattafa's version leans slightly heavier on synthetic oud and woody undertones, resulting in a more linear projection compared to Tom Ford's complex evolution. The top notes are less refined with slightly sharper citrus, and the overall composition lacks some of the creamy vanilla depth and refined nuance found in the original.

The clone features a slightly sweeter, more amber-forward opening compared to the original's cleaner oud introduction, and the dry-down leans more prominently toward vanilla and musk rather than the subtle mineral undertones of Tom Ford's version. Afnan's projection is more aggressive in the initial hours, whereas Oud Wood develops more gradually with refined subtlety.

Platinum Oud delivers stronger synthetic oud and sweeter vanilla-amber finish compared to the original's balanced woody-spiced profile. Longevity and sillage are moderate on the clone, while Oud Wood projects with greater refinement and depth.

The clone has slightly reduced longevity and sillage, with a less pronounced cardamom accent and a thinner development of the oud throughout the fragrance's life. The overall character is more straightforward and less nuanced than the original's sophisticated spiced-woody profile.

The clone delivers similar base notes but with reduced projection and a less crisp top accord; Oud Wood's signature peppery opening is softened in Lamasat Oud, and the mid-stage transition feels less seamless.

Dark Aoud lacks the creamy vanilla-tonka sweetness that rounds out Oud Wood's base, resulting in a more austere, oud-forward finish. The rosewood and pepper also feel slightly less refined in the opening, giving the clone a less polished character overall.

The clone generally has slightly shorter longevity (4-5 hours vs 6-8 hours) and the woody-amber drydown lacks the sophisticated blending found in the original. The spice notes may also project slightly more prominently in the clone, making it feel less balanced overall.

Private Oud delivers stronger spice intensity upfront but sacrifices the original's complexity and smoothness in the dry-down; longevity and sillage are noticeably less prominent than the genuine Tom Ford formulation.

The clone exhibits slightly shorter longevity (5-6 hours vs 7-8 hours) and a more linear progression with less of the creamy amber-vanilla base that develops in the original. Sillage is comparable, but the overall fragrance feels slightly less refined and more straightforward in its woody-spice character.

Orchid Nera simplifies the base notes, omitting the incense and chocolate elements while delivering a lighter, more straightforward interpretation. The original has superior sillage and a more layered, luxurious dry-down, while the clone tends toward a cleaner, more linear floral fragrance.

Dua's version simplifies the middle notes and reduces the prominent incense and spice characteristics found in the original. The overall composition feels less gourmand and more traditionally floral, with slightly shorter longevity typical of Dua's formulations.

The clone simplifies Black Orchid's multifaceted composition, particularly losing the smoky incense complexity and subtle tuberose elegance. Longevity is significantly shorter (4-5 hours vs 8+ hours), and the base doesn't develop the same depth and richness as the original.

The clone misses Black Orchid's spicy accords and the prominent chocolate-incense interplay that defines the scent's unique character. Dua's version is cleaner and more straightforward, with reduced longevity and sillage compared to the original's projecting, long-lasting formula.

The clone misses Black Orchid's signature Mexican chocolate, incense, and spice notes that provide its unique character and longevity. Celestial Flower is lighter and more conventionally floral, without the dark, gourmand complexity of the original.

The clone delivers a cleaner, more straightforward floral composition without the gourmand and spiced elements that define the original. Longevity and sillage are typically less pronounced in Rasasi's version compared to the Tom Ford powerhouse.

The clone omits key elements like tuberose, incense, and the distinctive Mexican chocolate note that creates Black Orchid's addictive depth. Longevity appears reduced, and the overall composition feels more linear and less nuanced than the original's multi-layered structure.

Oud Jamal adds a strong oud accord not present in the original, making it more oud-focused than a true Black Orchid dupe. The clone also misses the spiced, chocolate-forward base that gives Black Orchid its unique sophisticated character, resulting in a more traditionally oriental fragrance.

The clone introduces oud as a major player, making it noticeably more woody-animalic compared to Black Orchid's balanced sweet-floral approach. Additionally, Aud 24 Hours lacks the distinctive Mexican chocolate note and incense warmth that gives the original its sophisticated character.

The clone delivers comparable performance in the top and heart notes but falls short in longevity and base development, with a noticeably lighter, more synthetic finish compared to the original's creamy, warm drydown.

Sutoor delivers stronger peach sweetness upfront but misses the subtle bitterness and osmanthus floral character central to Bitter Peach; the original also has superior longevity and a more refined drydown, while the clone tends to fade more quickly and lacks the balanced complexity.

The clone delivers good fruity top notes but misses the nuanced bitter-almond character and woody complexity of the original. Longevity and sillage are also noticeably lighter, with the scent fading faster and projecting less intensely.

The clone's opening is more citrus-driven and less nuanced than the original's sophisticated bitter peach accord, and overall performance appears somewhat softer with reduced projection and longevity compared to Tom Ford's formulation.

Sour Peach emphasizes sour/tart qualities over bitter complexity, and generally exhibits shorter longevity and softer sillage compared to the original's powerful projection. The base feels slightly less balanced and creamy due to reduced tonka bean prominence.

The clone misses the bitter peach opening and cardamom nuance that define the original's complexity; Safari Elixir also tends toward shorter longevity (4-5 hours vs. 6-8 hours) and reduced sillage, making it less projection-forward than Tom Ford's creation.

The clone substitutes sandalwood for vetiver in the base, resulting in a warmer but less refined finish. Longevity is reduced by approximately 2-3 hours, and projection is notably softer throughout the wear time.

The clone performs well in projection and longevity but features a slightly more synthetic leather accord and less developed oakmoss base complexity compared to the original. The jasmine presence is more prominent and less restrained than in Ombre Leather, affecting the overall leather-forward composition.

The clone presents a slightly drier, more linear leather profile compared to Tom Ford's complex, evolving composition, and the supporting amber and woody base feels less refined. Additionally, Pendora's longevity runs 2-3 hours shorter than the original's impressive 8+ hour performance.

The original's oakmoss and aromatic depth are notably absent in Passion, replaced with a softer musk accord that makes the clone feel less textured and refined. Longevity and sillage also tend to be slightly weaker on the clone compared to the designer version.

While Ombre Leather emphasizes balanced leather with delicate spice, Riffs Exotic Oud pushes the woody oud element forward, creating a more intense and less refined character. The clone also lacks some of the original's creamy smoothness, leaning toward a drier, more animalic leather finish.

The clone typically shows reduced longevity and sillage compared to the original. The leather note feels less authentic and refined, with a more synthetic undertone, while the base lacks the creamy, woody richness that defines Tom Ford's signature composition.

The clone sacrifices some of the sophisticated floral nuance found in the original, presenting a more straightforward leather-woody profile with reduced longevity and a less elegant sillage. While structurally similar, 'I Have Money' lacks the subtle sophistication and lasting power characteristic of the Tom Ford original.

Rare Carbon is slightly thinner in projection and longevity compared to the original, with a less nuanced leather accord that doesn't evolve as richly over time. The base notes feel more straightforward without the sophisticated oakmoss undertones that give Ombre Leather its refined character.

Velvet Oud introduces oud as a major player, while the original focuses on leather, suede, and olibanum without oud. The clone's jasmine presence is diminished, and the overall character skews darker and more oriental compared to the original's sophisticated leather-centric profile.

The clone's longevity falls short of the original (typically 4-5 hours vs. 6-8+ hours), and the leather accord feels less buttery and nuanced. The cardamom note projects more prominently in the clone, potentially overpowering the delicate jasmine balance found in Ombre Leather.

Opulence Leather has a brighter, spicier opening and shorter longevity (4-6 hours vs 8+ hours), with less prominent amber and woody base development compared to the original's layered, evolving leather composition.

The clone's longevity and sillage are typically slightly less pronounced than the original, and the oud presence feels more muted, resulting in a cleaner rather than denser dry-down. Dua's version may also feature a slightly sharper saffron note compared to the softer, more integrated spice in Tom Ford's composition.

The women's version has a slightly brighter, more fruity rose opening compared to Noir De Noir's darker saffron-truffle depth. The oud is present but less complex, and the overall composition is lighter and more wearable. Longevity is 6-8 hours versus the original's 10-12 hours.

The clone exhibits shorter longevity and reduced sillage compared to the original, with a less pronounced tuberose presence and diminished oud prominence. The overall composition feels more linear and less sophisticated in its development.

The original has superior oud quality and leather blending with better silky texture, while the clone presents a harsher, more artificial oud profile. Projection and longevity on the clone are noticeably reduced compared to the designer version.

The clone performs well in the opening and mid-stages but struggles with longevity and base note projection compared to the original. Dua's version is noticeably sweeter in the dry-down, lacking some of the sophisticated oud character that defines Fucking Fabulous.

The clone matches the original's structure well but lacks subtle depth in longevity, with noticeably reduced sillage in the final hours. The tobacco and leather notes are present but appear less refined, making the clone feel slightly more straightforward and less refined overall.

The clone trades iris for geranium in the heart, resulting in slightly less complexity. Longevity and sillage are comparable, though the original's dry-down feels more layered and sophisticated.

The clone lacks the full floral sophistication of the original's heart notes, particularly missing the prominent jasmine element. Longevity and sillage are moderately reduced compared to Tom Ford's version, making it a budget-friendly but less impactful alternative.

The clone simplifies the base notes, reducing the distinctive kulfi and mastic elements that give Noir Extreme its unique character. Longevity and sillage are typically moderate on the clone compared to the original's excellent performance.

The major divergence is Armaf's prominent oud base, which overshadows the delicate woody-amber balance of the original. The clone also misses the creamy kulfi note and the refined herbal-floral complexity that define Noir Extreme's identity.

The clone's introduction of prominent oud is a notable departure from Noir Extreme's creamy, spice-forward base, resulting in a different dry-down character. Longevity and sillage are likely comparable, but the scent trajectory differs meaningfully in the final hours.

The clone generally performs adequately in longevity but exhibits slightly less sillage than the original. The almond sweetness is less prominent, making Love Spark feel somewhat more delicate and less gourmand overall.

The clone trades Electric Cherry's peppery complexity for a lighter citrus opening and has marginally shorter longevity (5-6 hours vs. 7-8 hours). Sillage is also somewhat closer to skin on Cherry Buzz.

The clone matches the top and middle notes well but shows reduced longevity (4-5 hours vs 6-8 hours for the original) and a slightly more linear dry-down. Sillage is comparable, though the original has better depth and complexity in the base.

The clone delivers comparable fruity opening and floral heart, but exhibits noticeably shorter longevity and reduced sillage. The base notes lack complexity and warmth, making the overall composition feel thinner and less luxurious than the designer version.

The clone performs adequately in opening notes but shows reduced longevity and sillage compared to the original. The base notes, particularly oud and cedarwood, are noticeably more subtle, making the fragrance feel slightly thinner overall.

La Ree's version skews slightly sweeter and less nuanced in the base, with noticeably shorter longevity and reduced sillage compared to Tom Ford's fuller projection. The oud component is either absent or severely subdued, making the clone feel more straightforward and less luxurious.

Fragrance World's version lacks the depth and intensity of Tom Ford's oud and leather interplay, resulting in less longevity and projection. The top notes feel slightly more spiced and less refined, making the overall composition more approachable but less luxurious.

The clone's base is noticeably thinner and less nuanced, missing the oud depth that gives Cherry Smoke its distinctive character. Longevity and sillage are also reduced compared to the designer original, with the clone fading more quickly after 4-5 hours.

Oud 24 Hours emphasizes oud as the central note while Tom Ford's Cherry Smoke maintains better cherry-smoke balance; the clone has stronger oriental DNA with reduced leather prominence. Longevity and sillage favor the clone, but the scent trajectory differs significantly from the original.

The clone exhibits marginally shorter longevity and slightly reduced sillage compared to the original. The heart notes may lack the same sophisticated geranium-rose interplay, with the composition feeling somewhat more linear and less complex in its mid-stage development.

The clone lacks the sharp black pepper and grapefruit intensity of the original's opening, and the base is warmer and less mineral-driven due to sandalwood replacing cedarwood. Longevity and sillage are approximately 15-20% lighter on the clone.

The clone's synthetic musk base is noticeably more prominent and less refined than the original's natural-leaning foundation, and longevity is approximately 2-3 hours shorter. The rose note is slightly sharper and less balanced in the heart compared to Tom Ford's more nuanced floral composition.

The clone's heart leans more toward geranium rather than peony, and uses cedar instead of vetiver in the base, creating a slightly drier, less refined woody drydown. Top note citrus profile is also marginally different, with lemon replacing the original's grapefruit for a sharper opening.

The clone delivers a more linear, simpler composition with less herbal complexity and aromatic depth than the original. Longevity and sillage are typically moderate in both, though Neroli Portofino tends to project slightly better due to its refined construction.

La Ree's version is more straightforward and less complex, missing key herbal and aromatic elements that define the original's character. The clone also has noticeably shorter longevity and reduced sillage compared to the designer fragrance.

The clone successfully replicates the zesty citrus and floral top/middle but has a less sophisticated dry-down with reduced longevity and sillage compared to the original. Dua's version leans slightly greener and less powdery overall, missing some of the original's subtle herbal complexity.

The original features more intricate herbal and botanical depth with distinctive notes like myrtle and pitosporum, while Wild Neroli delivers a more linear citrus-floral composition. Longevity and sillage are likely slightly softer on the clone compared to the designer original.

The clone delivers 85-90% of the top and middle performance but falls short in base longevity and the refined pitosporum-ambrette interplay that gives Portofino its distinctive smoothness. Sillage is comparable but the overall scent profile feels slightly more linear and less evolving over time.

Al Haramain's version is noticeably simpler in the heart and base, missing the herbal aromatic complexity of the original. Longevity and sillage are moderate but fall short of the designer's impressive performance, particularly in the dry-down phase.

Lazuli simplifies the floral profile and substitutes generic musk for the original's more subtle ambrette, resulting in less longevity and projection. The clone also misses the herbal complexity (myrtle, specific pitosporum character) that distinguishes Neroli Portofino's sophisticated composition.

The clone delivers a simpler, more linear composition with reduced herbal complexity and a more conventional musk-based base compared to Tom Ford's more refined amber-angelica foundation. Longevity and sillage are moderately reduced on Safari, lasting 4-5 hours versus Neroli Portofino's 6-7 hour performance.

The clone leans more heavily into raw tobacco and cigar notes at the expense of the original's balanced whiskey-oud interplay and superior projection. La Ree's version typically shows reduced longevity and sillage compared to Tom Ford's masterful formulation.

The clone's oud lacks the Tom Ford depth and smoothness, presenting as more straightforward and woody rather than animalic. Perfume Parlour's version typically shows slightly less projection and a faster dry-down compared to the original's extended wearing time.

Dua's version tends to lean slightly heavier on the tobacco in the opening, while Tom Ford achieves better balance between the oud and tobacco throughout the wear. Longevity and sillage are comparable, but the original's nuanced sandalwood-patchouli base feels more refined and layered.

The clone lacks the prominent whiskey facet that provides Tom Ford's version with distinctive depth and spice complexity. Dua's interpretation leans heavier on the oud and tobacco throughout, potentially offering better longevity but sacrificing some of the original's refined character.