X For Men

“Review is based on several samples from a 1ml decant. worn during the winter months (30F).I much prefer this fragrance to Clive C. 1872 . However, it is not worth the exorbitant retail price. It has moderate sillage and moderate longevity.I get only cedar scent in the opening which overwhelms all other supposed notes for the entire time the fragrance is detectable (4 hours). It is not offensive and could be worn in many situation during the cooler months from office to formal dinner.”

“This dude below me sounds like those free bottle brigaders.This is not a very strong fragrance. This is way more of an aromatic fragrance rather than an woody amber spicy like it shows. I require 5 or 6 sprays and it doesn't really last very long. It noes better now that it's summertime, but in the winter thi performance is abysmal. The scent is good, but i would never say this is "the most masculine scent". It is tired, old and dated for sure.Overall 4.5/10. Not at all worth the money, but it is better than some crappy clone, that's for sure!”

“Such a great smelling fragrance, but longevity sucks. For the price wish it lasted longer. I did find better alternative, Monarch by Vertus smells identical, but I get much better longevity and silage, my t-shirt smells for the next couple of days. Its also cheaper than X.”